Review - (2023) Volume 16, Issue 103

Ritual Innovation in Unprecedented Times: Lessons from Multi-Faith Responses to COVID-19
Radman Ivan*
Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
*Correspondence: Radman Ivan, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA, Email:

Received: Aug 02, 2023, Manuscript No. jisr-23-111066; Editor assigned: Aug 04, 2023, Pre QC No. jisr-23-111066; Reviewed: Aug 18, 2023, QC No. jisr-23-111066; Revised: Aug 24, 2023, Manuscript No. jisr-23-111066; Published: Aug 30, 2023, DOI: 10.17719/jisr.2023.111066


The COVID-19 pandemic brought about unparalleled disruptions to the religious landscape, challenging established rituals and practices across diverse faiths. This review article examines the innovative responses of various religious communities to the crisis, highlighting the ways in which these adaptations not only sustained spiritual connections but also revealed deeper insights into the nature of faith. By analyzing the lessons learned from the multi-faith ritual innovations, this article aims to shed light on the universality of religious values and the potential for continued growth in times of uncertainty. The COVID-19 crisis truly challenged social interaction, the use of space and objects, as well as our sense of purpose and meaning in life. In this context, religious communities faced sudden interruption of their usual activities, lack of access to communal spaces and a global epidemic that summoned ancient “medieval plague” anxieties to work with. To analyze this repertoire of adaptations we focus on three aspects: the general context of changes and challenges, the ritual adaptations and the subjective experience of the adaptations.


Religious change, pandemic, ritual theory, COVID-19, religious minorities, multireligious comparative.


The global pandemic necessitated the reimagining of religious rituals, leading to remarkable innovations that transcended traditional boundaries. This article delves into the transformative changes that emerged from multi-faith responses, exploring how rituals evolved, adapted, and maintained their significance during the pandemic [1].

While conducting the research, the interviews revealed a fascinating and complex variety of ritual adaptations that deserve specific attention. Considering the diverse sample, different communities responded with various strategies based on their own priorities: some emphasized the quality of the ritual according to tradition, while others focused on maintaining community continuity or even increasing their numbers if possible [2]. Some communities tailored their adaptations based on an experimental sense of satisfaction or dissatisfaction that emerged during the adjusted celebrations. Throughout the research, we discovered that these types of responses strongly align with recent theories about elasticity in linguistics. This implies that both the communication and the stretching of the terms are conditioned by the socio-cultural environment, because the speaker’s needs, the emerging circumstances and the negotiation are usually defined according to cultural and social considerations for a particular context. However, elasticity is considered a universal property of languages, and Zhang argues that its characteristics and functioning might be universal too [3].

Elasticity and ritual

According to Grace Q. Zhang, elasticity is the “springy” property that allows the stretching of linguistic terms and expressions in multiple manners and contexts to satisfy emerging discursive needs. In a metaphoric sense, stretching means “adjust, modify, and manipulate our words” to accommodate a satisfying communicative interaction. In linguistic communication, elasticity is strategic, as it seems to be in rituals, which means that it must have a goal [4]. For Zhang’s model, the goal is, typically, communication, but for the purpose of a ritual analysis, we cannot assume that communication with the sacred or with the religious community is always a goal; although, it might be. According to our definition of ritual, the proper goal of ritual behavior is to organize the experience of the sacred, whatever each community might define as sacred and orders, for that matter. Thus, the adaptations we found in 20 denominations in Spain seem to have been ruled by the general purpose of ensuring a proper experience of the sacred, at the same time that the measures against COVID-19 forced the communities to stretch, adjust and negotiate the ways of organizing that experience [5].

Innovative responses across faiths

The COVID-19 crisis prompted religious communities to explore novel approaches to ritual engagement. Innovations included the shift from physical gatherings to virtual platforms, creative adaptations of sacraments, the emergence of home altars and shrines, and the redefinition of pilgrimages. Drive-in worship services, remote religious education, and interfaith initiatives for social support were among other notable innovations [6].

Resilience of tradition: The pandemic underscored the resilience of religious traditions. Despite changing circumstances, the core values and teachings remained intact, emphasizing the enduring nature of faith.

Spiritual connection: Virtual platforms enabled congregations to maintain a sense of spiritual connection even when physical gatherings were impossible [7]. The pandemic showcased the adaptability of faith in fostering community across digital spaces.

Unity in diversity: Multi-faith responses highlighted the shared values of compassion, solidarity, and social responsibility. Interfaith initiatives demonstrated that religious differences could be bridged to address common challenges.

Inward reflection: The shift towards individual and family-based rituals emphasized the internal dimensions of faith [8]. Home altars and personal practices allowed for introspection and a deeper understanding of spirituality.

Environmental consciousness: The reduction in human activity prompted religious communities to reflect on their environmental impact, reinforcing the ecological dimensions of many faiths.

Redefining pilgrimage: The inability to undertake traditional pilgrimages led to a reevaluation of the spiritual journey. The concept of an internal, metaphorical pilgrimage resonated across various faiths [9].

Implications for future practice

The innovative responses to the pandemic hold important implications for the future practice of religion. They underscore the importance of embracing technology without compromising the essence of ritual, fostering interfaith collaborations, and engaging in meaningful acts of social service [10]. The pandemic has shown that rituals can be adapted to meet the needs of the present while retaining their profound spiritual significance.


The COVID-19 pandemic served as a crucible for ritual innovation across diverse faiths, revealing the shared values that underpin religious traditions. The lessons learned from multi-faith responses highlight the dynamic and evolving nature of faith, its capacity to adapt in times of crisis, and its role in fostering connection, compassion, and resilience. As the world navigates future uncertainties, the experiences of ritual innovation during the pandemic offer invaluable insights into how faith can continue to thrive and inspire, transcending barriers and enriching lives.

In order to explore this transformation, we applied a linguistic approach, which is a classic strategy since the debt of ritual studies with linguistics and semiotics is as old as it is fruitful. Our purpose was to contribute to the contemporary literature on creativity and innovation that is changing the classic approach and notion of ritual as fixed, rigid, traditional, etc. In doing so, we also tried to develop a wide multireligious perspective that is not usual for these matters. As a result, we state that the role of religion in challenging times cannot be reduced to the mere functions of coping mechanisms or making sense of the irrational (secular theme). Challenging times give us the opportunity to explore religion and ritual with a new perspective that pays attention to how innovations happen, what are the goals that lead them, what features they bring, etc. While more research is needed, our analysis of ritual adaptations to COVID-19 measures in Spain suggests that there might be universal factors of ritual elasticity, even when they are also embedded in contexts and cultures.


  1. Alsancak F, ve Kutlu İ. (2020). Çifte Mağduriyetin Özneleri Olarak Engelli Mültecilere İlişkin Bir İnceleme. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi. 15 (2): 590-598.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Arıkan, Ç. (2002). Sosyal Model Çerçevesinde Özürlülüğe Yaklaşım, Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi, Türkiye Körler Federasyonu Yayını. 2 (1): 11-25.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  5. Babaoğlu, C. (2015). Türkiye’de Engelli Politikaları ve Sivil Toplum Örgütlerinin Kentsel Engelli Politikalarına Etkisi: Ankara Örneği, Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  6. Google Scholar

  7. Burcu, E. (2015). Engellilik Sosyolojisi. Anı: Ankara.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  9. Buckup, S. (2009). The price of Exclusion: The Economic Consequences of Excluding People with Disabilities from the World of Work. Employment Sector Working Paper No. 43, ILO, Geneva.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  11. CDC, (2022). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Developmental Disabilities.
  12. Google Scholar

  13. Çakran, Ş. ve Eren, V. (2017).Mülteci Politikası: Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye Karşılaştırması”, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 14 (39): 1-30.
  14. Google Scholar

  15. Çondur, F.; Yenipazarlı, A. ve Cömertler, N. (2020). Engelli İstihdamının Dünyada ve Türkiye’deki Görünümü, Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi (ASEAD). 7 (5): 347-362.
  16. Google Scholar

  17. Deniz, T. (2014). Uluslar Arası Göç Sorunu Perspektifinde Türkiye. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 18:1.
  18. Google Scholar

  19. DHS, (2022). U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Refugees and Asylees.
  20. Google Scholar


You can send your paper at Online Submission System

  • The Journal of International Social Research / Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi ISSN: 1307-9581, an international, peer-reviewed, on the web publication, from 2007 will be issued least four times annualy.
  • Our journal is an independent academic publication based on research in social sciences, contributing to its field and trying to publish scientific articles that will bring innovation to the original and social sciences.
  • The journal has got an international editorial board and referee board, mainly embodied from the each individually professional on the social research fields.
  • Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / The Journal of International Social Research became a member of Cross Reff since 2014 and started to assign DOI numbers to the articles. image
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 7760

The Journal of International Social Research received 7760 citations as per Google Scholar report

The Journal of International Social Research peer review process verified by publons
Get the App