Mini Article - (2023) Volume 16, Issue 100

Egocentric Networks in the Digital Age: Advances in Data Collection Methods
Cagno Valeria*
Department of Sociology, William James Hall, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
*Correspondence: Cagno Valeria, Department of Sociology, William James Hall, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA, Email:

Received: May 02, 2023, Manuscript No. jisr-23-100617; Editor assigned: May 05, 2023, Pre QC No. jisr-23-100617 (PQ); Reviewed: May 19, 2023, QC No. jisr-23-100617; Revised: May 24, 2023, Manuscript No. jisr-23-100617 (R); Published: May 31, 2023, DOI: 10.17719/jisr.2023.100617


Egocentric network research rests on information about the social relationships that surround a focal actor, depicting that actor's immediate social context; when the focal actor is an individual person, it is often termed personal network research. Egocentric networks engage the attention of social scientists because they are channels through which information, social support, and other resources flow to and from the focal actor to others; they are implicated in the shaping and reproduction of opinions, preferences, and worldviews; and affiliations within them—when visible to others—can reflect and serve as signals of the actor's social standing and status. It begins with background on setting egocentric network boundaries and principal types of instruments that obtain information about such networks. It then discusses innovations in data collection and studies of data quality. The bulk of these address questions about “name generator” instruments that obtain information about the alters and relationships in a subject's network. Among topics receiving substantial attention in recent research are mitigation of respondent burden, interviewer effects, survey mode, and the performance of name generators in longitudinal studies.


Understanding the structure and dynamics of social networks is crucial for various fields, including sociology, psychology, anthropology, and marketing. Egocentric network data, also known as personal network data, focuses on the social relationships surrounding an individual, providing valuable insights into their social interactions, influence, and support systems. Collecting such data has traditionally relied on self-reporting methods, which can be subject to biases and memory limitations. However, recent advances and innovations in data collection techniques have revolutionized the way egocentric network data is gathered, offering more accurate, comprehensive, and timely information. In this article, we explore some of these advancements and their potential implications for research and practical applications.

Approaches to assembling information about egocentric networks vary somewhat, depending on the purposes the data are to serve. Very often these call for measures of network form and composition for subsequent use as response variables in analyses that aspire to explain variability in network range or diversity, social capital, social integration, or social support, or as explanatory factors in studies of achievements, attitudes, behaviors or orientations. Distinct from such individual-level questions are proposals to employ egocentric data in modeling properties of whole networks.

Survey instruments for network data

Among the appeals of egocentric analysis is its compatibility with representative sample survey designs; it is one approach to incorporating elements of a respondent's social context within the latter. Such networks are defined in terms of an ego, alters, and relationships among them, and the “name generator” instruments discussed below attempt to elicit all of these elements. Not all research objectives require that individual alters and relationships be enumerated, however. This can be unnecessary when research questions center on specific network properties and are in any case impractical for large types of networks. Single survey items about network properties can contain very large amounts of measurement error, but scholars have developed several comparatively short instruments that obtain substantial data about certain network properties while making modest demands on survey respondents. While each has particular features, all of them are grounded on sets of questions about network composition, sometimes supplemented with additional information. We describe these here, and then summarize recent studies bearing on their data collection methods and the measures they provide.

Mobile Sensing and Wearable Technology

One significant breakthrough in collecting egocentric network data comes from the integration of mobile sensing and wearable technology. Smartphones equipped with built-in sensors and wearable devices with advanced tracking capabilities allow researchers to gather real-time data on individuals' social interactions, spatial movements, and communication patterns. By leveraging Bluetooth, GPS, Wi-Fi, and accelerometer data, these devices can automatically detect nearby individuals, measure proximity, and record face-to-face interactions. This approach eliminates reliance on self-reporting, providing a more objective and detailed account of social connections.

Social Media Analysis

The widespread use of social media platforms has opened up new avenues for studying egocentric networks. Social media analysis enables researchers to explore the digital footprint of individuals, examining their online social connections, communication patterns, and information sharing behaviors. By analyzing user profiles, friend lists, and message exchanges, researchers can construct comprehensive egocentric networks that capture both offline and online relationships. Additionally, sentiment analysis and topic modeling techniques applied to social media data offer insights into the nature and strength of these connections.

Sensor-Embedded Personal Objects

Another innovative approach involves using sensor-embedded personal objects, such as smart badges or RFID tags, to capture egocentric network data. These objects can be worn or carried by individuals, and they record proximity and interaction data whenever they come into contact with other objects or individuals. By analyzing the collected data, researchers can reconstruct egocentric networks, map social interactions, and quantify social support systems in a non-intrusive and continuous manner.

Social Network Surveys

While self-reporting methods have limitations, advances in survey design and administration have improved the accuracy and reliability of egocentric network data collection. Researchers have developed innovative survey instruments that utilize visual aids, memory cues, and social network diagrams to help individuals recall and report their social connections more accurately. These tools facilitate the collection of comprehensive data on egocentric networks, including information on relationship strength, tie multiplexity, and support networks.

Natural Language Processing and Text Analysis

Text-based communication, such as emails, text messages, and chat transcripts, contains valuable information about social relationships and network structures. Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques can be applied to analyze these textual data sources, extracting social network information, identifying relationship types, and mapping communication patterns. NLP algorithms can identify sentiment, emotional tone, and social roles within conversations, providing insights into the dynamics and structure of egocentric networks.


Advances and innovations in data collection methods have transformed the study of egocentric networks, offering researchers more accurate, comprehensive, and timely data. Mobile sensing, social media analysis, sensor-embedded personal objects, improved survey designs, and natural language processing techniques have expanded the possibilities of understanding social interactions and relationships in unprecedented ways. These advancements have implications for diverse fields, including social sciences, healthcare, marketing, and urban planning, providing insights into human behavior and social dynamics. As technology continues to evolve, we can expect further advancements in the collection and analysis of egocentric network data, leading to deeper insights into the complex nature of human social networks.


  1. Kennedy Randall (2003). Interracial Intimacies: Sex, Marriage, Identity, and Adoption. New York: Pantheon.
  2. Google Scholar

  3. Kennedy Roger G (1994). Hidden Cities: The Discovery and Loss of Ancient North American Civilization.USA: Free Press.
  4. Google Scholar

  5. King, Desmond (2000). The Color of Race in America: Immigration, Race, and the Origins of the Diverse Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2000.
  6. Google Scholar

  7. King M (1963). Letterfrom Birmingham Jail; The Negro Is Your Brother.  The Atlantic Monthly. 212 (2): 78– 88.
  8. Google Scholar

  9. Kloppenberg JT (1998). The Virtues of Liberalism.  Oxford UniversityPress; 1998.
  10. Google Scholar

  11. Kramer LS (2011). Nationalism in Europe and America : Politics, Cultures, and Identities Since 1775. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  13. Lloyd W. Brown. (1976).  TheAmericanDreamandtheLegacy of Revolution in thePoetry of LangstonHughes. Studies in Black Literature. pp.16–18.
  14. Google Scholar

  15. Mahfouz Safi Mahmoud (2013). America's Melting Pot ortheSaladBowl: TheStageImmigrant's Dilemma. Journal of Foreign Languages, Cultures & Civilizations. 1 (2): December 2013. 
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  17. McDonald, Robert MS (1999). Thomas Jefferson’s Changing Reputation as Author of the Decleration of Independence: The First Fifty Years. Journal of theEarlyRepublic. 19 (2): 169-195.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Ngai Mae (2004).  Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  20. Google Scholar  


You can send your paper at Online Submission System

  • The Journal of International Social Research / Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi ISSN: 1307-9581, an international, peer-reviewed, on the web publication, from 2007 will be issued least four times annualy.
  • Our journal is an independent academic publication based on research in social sciences, contributing to its field and trying to publish scientific articles that will bring innovation to the original and social sciences.
  • The journal has got an international editorial board and referee board, mainly embodied from the each individually professional on the social research fields.
  • Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / The Journal of International Social Research became a member of Cross Reff since 2014 and started to assign DOI numbers to the articles. image
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 7760

The Journal of International Social Research received 7760 citations as per Google Scholar report

The Journal of International Social Research peer review process verified by publons
Get the App