THE INCONSISTENCTY OF SOME CONTEMPORARY INTERPRETATIONS OF KHARIJITE WITH RESPECT TO IMAMATE

Abstract

Author(s): Mehmet KUBAT

Since Imamate (head of state) is accepted as the task of delegation and substitute to the Prophet, is seen an important institution combining two elements such as religion and politics. Since it is seen as the apostleship of the caliphate, the most important and serious differences of opinion have developed around the issue of caliphate or head of state throughout history. The disputes arisen around the question of imamate in the first period of Islam have not only prepared the way of emergence of many theological problems but also caused divisions among some of the well-known sects. In the debates emerged about the issue of Imamate; Kharijites refused the condition stating that the Imam should belong to Quraysh tribe and declared that it must be selected; Shia das defended the appointment of caliph, Ahl al-Sunnah has adopted the requirement of belonging to Quraysh tribe. In the present article, after briefly introducing systems adopted by Islamic sects in the selection of caliphate, some comments put forward by some contemporary writers without taking the time and the conjuncture into consideration about the views of Kharijites on defending electoral system and the appointment of the head of state will be critized and their inconsistency will be revealed.

Announcements

You can send your paper at https://www.scholarscentral.org/submissions/international-social-research.html

  • The Journal of International Social Research / Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi ISSN: 1307-9581, an international, peer-reviewed, on the web publication, from 2007 will be issued least four times annualy.
  • Our journal is an independent academic publication based on research in social sciences, contributing to its field and trying to publish scientific articles that will bring innovation to the original and social sciences.
  • The journal has got an international editorial board and referee board, mainly embodied from the each individually professional on the social research fields.
  • Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / The Journal of International Social Research became a member of Cross Reff since 2014 and started to assign DOI numbers to the articles. image
Google scholar citation report
Citations : 27

The Journal of International Social Research received 27 citations as per google scholar report

The Journal of International Social Research peer review process verified by publons
Get the App