Author(s): Nurullah AGÄ°TOÄLU
There are two problems with the hadiths that can be considered as the verbal transfer of circumcision, the second main source of Islam: Detection and understanding. The determination of hadiths, that is, the issue of the correction of the sahih from the unsanitary, is one of the main aims of the hadith method or even hadith sciences. Because It is known that after the death of the Prophet (pbuh), many words such as hadith were made, especially with the occurrence of mischief. As a precaution against this situation, some scientific studies have been carried out in the field of hadith. In these studies, it is aimed to distinguish sahih hadiths from the mevzu hadiths. It is possible to say this hadith criticism in general. The sine qua non of the hadith criticism is the science of Cerh-Tadil. The science of Cerh-Tadil is like the control system of the ?snad as a tool in reaching the Sahih hadith. As well as very important works have been given in this field of science, he has also produced many scholarly works on the Rical literature that feeds him in general terms. One of them is Ebu Hatim Muhammed b. Hibban b. Ahmad el-Busti. (d. 354/965) An important name of the area, Ibn Hibbân said that he was very cautious when he was practicing the narrators, but some scholars made him criticize that he was overly acting about the surgeon and decided to take some haste. However, acting hastily in the hadith criticism is likely to lead the person to erroneous results and sometimes increase the problem further. In this study, the issue of showing a hasty attitude in the hadith criticism will be handled in Ibn Hibbân. In fact, it is one of the main aims of this paper to emphasize how important the principle of being cautious / avoiding rush in other branches of science, in a sensitive science such as hadith criticism.
The Journal of International Social Research received 7760 citations as per Google Scholar report
