Author(s): ?smail Erim GLATI

Although computer-generated images are increasingly used in other areas of visual communication, there are strict principles for digital editing of photos in both the press and advertising sectors and not adhering to these principles causes serious consequences. This requires us to question our perception of both images and computer-generated images as well as the meaning of these two types of images. This study provides experiment-based data on the ability of professional photographers and those professionals interested in photo editing to distinguish photographs from computer-generated images that they see on a screen. The results clearly show that the participants cannot distinguish between these two types of images in a statistically significant manner. This shows that making this distinction will become increasingly difficult for the non-specialist as well as the participants, who were all competent individuals in their field. Interestingly, however, the study found out that the participants shared a rather traditional understanding of photography that was not compatible with today's digital photography and digital image production. Based on these results, it can be stated that there is need for a new type of visual literacy in order to better understand the use of computers in digital photography and to provide a basis for the use of digital photography in certain sectors because one could actually be looking at computer-generated images when they think that they are looking at photographs on screens, magazines, exhibitions or newspapers.


You can send your paper at

  • The Journal of International Social Research / Uluslararas覺 Sosyal Arat覺rmalar Dergisi ISSN: 1307-9581, an international, peer-reviewed, on the web publication, from 2007 will be issued least four times annualy.
  • Our journal is an independent academic publication based on research in social sciences, contributing to its field and trying to publish scientific articles that will bring innovation to the original and social sciences.
  • The journal has got an international editorial board and referee board, mainly embodied from the each individually professional on the social research fields.
  • Uluslararas覺 Sosyal Arat覺rmalar Dergisi / The Journal of International Social Research became a member of Cross Reff since 2014 and started to assign DOI numbers to the articles. image
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 27

The Journal of International Social Research received 27 citations as per Google Scholar report

The Journal of International Social Research peer review process verified by publons
Get the App