Author(s): Mustafa HOCAOÄLU
The Quran has intervened to life and has given direction to the people as soon as revealed. Indeed, the Quran states that the purpose of the revelation is that. For this reason, it has tried to be understood by the interlocutors from the first moment the Quran was revealed. The Quran was understood under the guidance of Muhammad (pbuh) in the first period; in time narrated-based and acumen-based understanding method were developed in order to understand the Qur'an. Very different understanding methods have emerged until today; however, fragmented approach has been adopted in these methods. It is seen that the interpretation of similar verses is different in these works, even sometimes contradict information is observed. There are major causes for this, but we think it must be underlined the sectarian approach or pre-acceptance factor. In this article, it will be focused on atomic/fragmented approach problem sometimes encountered in reading commentary or subjects research. Besides, it will be tried to show how effective pre-acceptance is within the meaning of the verses. The method to be followed here is “commentary on integrity”. Namely, it will be considered that the information given in the interpretation of a verse assessed or not in other verses on the same subject and whether the information given is contradictory. The statements made about the fifth verse of S?rat a?-?u?? and ninth verse of S?rat Ahqaf In Mafatih al-Ghayb written by Fakhr ad-Din ar-Razi will be studied and evaluated in the Quran/tafsir integrity.
The Journal of International Social Research received 7760 citations as per Google Scholar report
